Sorry ‘Bout That!

Leicaphilia is back up and running after an unforeseen technical problem with my WordPress software. I’ve been getting a lot of malicious visits to the site recently and didn’t quite understand the potential for mischief; apparently someone somewhere got into the administrative end of the site and somehow corrupted the system software. Why someone would take an malignant interest in the site is beyond me. Must be all that “speaking truth to power” (rolls eyes).

In any event, thank’s to the assistance of helpful friends, I’m back and intend to start posting again shortly.

Meanwhile I’m off to NYC for the weekend, taking along a Fuji S5 Pro, which I bought new-in-box on a whim for $225 (how could you not, for that price?) and which I’ve found to take absolutely beautiful film-like b&w jpegs straight from the camera. Why that would be the case? It has to do with its “Super CCD” ‘R’ pixel, which has a lower sensitivity and is designed to capture detail above the saturation point of the its regular ‘S’ pixel; the camera then combines the information from the ‘S’ and ‘R’ pixels to produce an extended dynamic range “shoulder” much like the highlight exposure curve of film (remember, sensors are linear – no exposure curve; that’s partly why digital simply cannot replicate the ‘film-look’ without post-processing, and even then, only partially, for reasons most of you already know and I’ve written about here).

The camera itself was introduced by Fuji in 2007. Fuji took the Nikon d200 body and put their funky SuperCCD sensor in it to produce a camera that offers digital files with pretty impressive dynamic range. Granted, current 2018 sensor technology offers some serious dynamic range as well, but what’s fascinating about the Fuji is that the extended sensitivity is concentrated on the shoulder of the histogram, unlike the standard sensor that, even with greater dynamic range, is still linear in its light sensitivity. Cool camera no doubt, added to the coolness the fact that the camera has a b&w jpg capture mode that gives really nice film-like monochrome images up to  about 1250 ISO, certainly more than enough for those of us used to pushing HP5 for low-light work. And it takes Nikon F mount lenses. And it was $225. And apparently its “vintage” digital, something that’s actually a thing these days, which I’ve written about here. What’s not to love? I’ll be sure to write more about the S5 Pro in the future (and, if past conduct is a predictor of future conduct, I assume I’ll eventually get tired of it, write an impassioned blog post about how I’m selling all my digital cameras because they have no soul, and sell it to a reader; but that’s further down the road).

The de rigueur Leica cat picture. This one a jpg direct from my new toy, the Fuji S5 Pro. Very ‘filmic,’ wouldn’t you agree?

I’ll also be taking with me my IIIg, just back from a necessary CLA from Youxin Ye. While I’ve voiced the opinion elsewhere that the CLA mania which possesses many Leicaphiles is pretty stupid, my IIIg had a stuck shutter, so for about the same price as the purchase price of the S5 Pro, Mr. Ye took it apart and cleaned and lubricated everything and now it feels beautiful, “buttery smooth”, which we all know is the only proper way for any film Leica to feel.

11 thoughts on “Sorry ‘Bout That!

  1. chrism

    I was a bit concerned when I tried the site a few times and got the garbage from WordPress, so congratulations on your return. I suspect your hacker has done more damage than you realise: that jpg looks nothing like film and you know it! It was just a bit quicker to develop, right?

  2. Jimbob

    Must have been Leica haters, with collusion from the Russians! Good to see the site up and running again. But this is giving me a GAS attack.

  3. Archiver

    Hello, good sir! Glad to see you back! For a while I was concerned that you’d had a change of heart and had let the blog suddenly lapse. It’s always enjoyable to read your thoughts and articles, and I hope you continue for as long as you find this game enjoyable.

    I hemmed and hawed about that Fuji camera, as I owned the Fuji F30 around the same time, and loved its output. But I eventually went the way of Canon, then diverted back to Zeiss and then Leica. It’s great to know that some of those ‘vintage’ digitals are still appreciated by folks like us.

  4. Kodachromeguy

    Happy New Year. Did Youxin re-cover your IIIg or find a way to patch the big area of missing vulcanite? I recently had my dad’s 1949 IIIc repaired and overhauled, and I was thrilled to have it back in operation.

  5. Richard

    I’m happy that the site is up and running again! Its great to read your articles so keep going strong in 2018!

  6. Rob Campbell

    Nice to have you back and firing on all cylinders. Like you, I often wonder where these malicious people find the buzz. There really must be at least a slight loosening of a vital screw somewhere in their attic. It simply does not make sense.

    I still have my D200 and use it more than my D700. Odd, but true.

    Rob

  7. Aaron

    What great taste you have. First the Sigma, now this. The S5 is one of a handful of “wanted to but never did…yet” cameras. I am super keen to hear your comparative commentary. Soon I hope.
    Obviously the draw would be for some gushing, “it changed my life!” declaration but I’ll be content with a “hey, that was fun, the near-pro level body handled like a sports car and the results from the distinctive chip were uncanny.”
    Or something like that.
    The fact that those of us huddled around the Leicaphilia fire, sharing a fifth of Canadian whiskey (builds character), are frequently straddling the divide of analogue and digital. With an affectation for the former and an undeniable acknowledgment of the near magical properties of that latter. The shared perspective, makes the group (or at least members such as myself) susceptible to having certain buttons pushed. Pleasing skin tones, gentle rolloff of the shoulder/highlights….Nom-nom.

    Waiting for an update with bated breath.

  8. Richard Newton

    Glad you are back. It is a well balanced blog on photography and it is great not to hear about the bokeh on the latest Leitz offering. I never heard of bokeh in my first 30 years of photography and was more concerned about things like composition, focus etc.

Comments are closed.